Data collection from crystals grown in microfluidic droplets.

Protein crystals grown in microfluidic droplets have been shown to be an effective and robust platform for storage, transport and serial crystallography data collection with a minimal impact on diffraction quality. Single macromolecular microcrystals grown in nanolitre-sized droplets allow the very efficient use of protein samples and can produce large quantities of high-quality samples for data collection. However, there are challenges not only in growing crystals in microfluidic droplets, but also in delivering the droplets into X-ray beams, including the physical arrangement, beamline and timing constraints and ease of use. Here, the crystallization of two human gut microbial hydrolases in microfluidic droplets is described: a sample-transport and data-collection approach that is inexpensive, is convenient, requires small amounts of protein and is forgiving. It is shown that crystals can be grown in 50-500 pl droplets when the crystallization conditions are compatible with the droplet environment. Local and remote data-collection methods are described and it is shown that crystals grown in microfluidics droplets and housed as an emulsion in an Eppendorf tube can be shipped from the US to the UK using a FedEx envelope, and data can be collected successfully. Details of how crystals were delivered to the X-ray beam by depositing an emulsion of droplets onto a silicon fixed-target serial device are provided. After three months of storage at 4°C, the crystals endured and diffracted well, showing only a slight decrease in diffracting power, demonstrating a suitable way to grow crystals, and to store and collect the droplets with crystals for data collection. This sample-delivery and data-collection strategy allows crystal droplets to be shipped and set aside until beamtime is available.

A Genomic Island of Vibrio cholerae Encodes a Three-Component Cytotoxin with Monomer and Protomer Forms Structurally Similar to Alpha-Pore-Forming Toxins.

Alpha-pore-forming toxins (α-PFTs) are secreted by many species of bacteria, including Escherichia coli, Aeromonas hydrophila, and Bacillus thuringiensis, as part of their arsenal of virulence factors, and are often cytotoxic. In particular, for α-PFTs, the membrane-spanning channel they form is composed of hydrophobic α-helices. These toxins oligomerize at the surface of target cells and transition from a soluble to a protomer state in which they expose their hydrophobic regions and insert into the membrane to form a pore. The pores may be composed of homooligomers of one component or heterooligomers with two or three components, resulting in bi- or tripartite toxins. The multicomponent α-PFTs are often expressed from a single operon. Recently, motility-associated killing factor A (MakA), an α-PFT, was discovered in Vibrio cholerae. We report that makA is found on the V. cholerae GI-10 genomic island within an operon containing genes for two other potential α-PFTs, MakB and MakE. We determined the X-ray crystal structures for MakA, MakB, and MakE and demonstrated that all three are structurally related to the α-PFT family in the soluble state, and we modeled their protomer state based on the α-PFT AhlB from A. hydrophila. We found that MakA alone is cytotoxic at micromolar concentrations. However, combining MakA with MakB and MakE is cytotoxic at nanomolar concentrations, with specificity for J774 macrophage cells. Our data suggest that MakA, -B, and -E are α-PFTs that potentially act as a tripartite pore-forming toxin with specificity for phagocytic cells. IMPORTANCE The bacterium Vibrio cholerae causes gastrointestinal, wound, and skin infections. The motility-associated killing factor A (MakA) was recently shown to be cytotoxic against colon, prostate, and other cancer cells. However, at the outset of this study, the capacity of MakA to damage cells in combination with other Mak proteins encoded in the same operon had not been elucidated. We determined the structures of three Mak proteins and established that they are structurally related to the α-PFTs. Compared to MakA alone, the combination of all three toxins was more potent specifically in mouse macrophages. This study highlights the idea that the Mak toxins are selectively cytotoxic and thus may function as a tripartite toxin with cell type specificity.